<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Area Man Passionate Defender Of What He Imagines Constitution To Be</title>
	<link>http://www.ustvmedia.org/what-is-patriotism/2009/12/01/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-constitution-to-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ustvmedia.org/what-is-patriotism/2009/12/01/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-constitution-to-be/#comment-46670</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ustvmedia.org/what-is-patriotism/2009/12/01/area-man-passionate-defender-of-what-he-imagines-constitution-to-be/#comment-46670</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;(Comments I received regarding this Onion article, which I felt worthy passing along - AV, USTV Media)&lt;/i&gt;

The Constitution is a mythological document.  A document we once referred to as our Constitution defined the three branches of governments and some procedural items, but application of the &quot;Bill of Rights&quot; has been fubar for over 100 years.  We're fast approaching the zenith of that misapplication.

TENTH AMENDMENT: &quot;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&quot;

Yeah, right...

&quot;Implied powers&quot;, &quot;explicit powers&quot;, &quot;commerce clause&quot;, and other overly-complicated and tortured interpretations notwithstanding, this hasn't been the case for generations.  If you don't accept my rationale for the 10th amendment, what about Patriot Acts I and II  as a violation of the 4th?

As for the &lt;i&gt;Onion&lt;/i&gt; article, I think I would have found it funnier if I thought the Constitution had any meaning at all except in our imaginations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(Comments I received regarding this Onion article, which I felt worthy passing along - AV, USTV Media)</i></p>
<p>The Constitution is a mythological document.  A document we once referred to as our Constitution defined the three branches of governments and some procedural items, but application of the &#8220;Bill of Rights&#8221; has been fubar for over 100 years.  We&#8217;re fast approaching the zenith of that misapplication.</p>
<p>TENTH AMENDMENT: &#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, right&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Implied powers&#8221;, &#8220;explicit powers&#8221;, &#8220;commerce clause&#8221;, and other overly-complicated and tortured interpretations notwithstanding, this hasn&#8217;t been the case for generations.  If you don&#8217;t accept my rationale for the 10th amendment, what about Patriot Acts I and II  as a violation of the 4th?</p>
<p>As for the <i>Onion</i> article, I think I would have found it funnier if I thought the Constitution had any meaning at all except in our imaginations.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

