Senate Commerce Committee Is Now a Telco/Cable PR Firm

September 27th, 2006 by Andy in Deconstructing The Media

To think that people question the basis of the claim that we do not live in a democratic republic, but rather a corporate state. Things like this should help dispel that illusion.

“A new bipartisan poll released today finds that an overwhelming majority of American voters favor video choice over onerous “Net Neutrality” regulations,” states a press release by the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. While bi-partisan it may be, honest it is not.

The Verizon funded survey, conducted by Glover Park Group (traditionally Democratic) and Public Opinion Strategies (traditionally Republican) questioned 800 registered voters on their thoughts on network neutrality. The survey in question uses a tactic known as “push polling”, which presents questions phrased in such a way as to elicit one particular answer.

This is the question asked used to support the committee’s assertion of public opposition to net-neutrality laws:

Which of the following two items do you think is the most important to you: Delivering the benefits of new TV and video choice so consumers will see increased competition and lower prices for cable TV, or enhancing Internet neutrality by barring high speed internet providers from offering specialized services like faster speed and increased security for a fee?

In this case the second option suggests that there is a push to prohibit ISPs from selling faster broadband speeds, a dishonest talking point we’ve seen used by incumbent PR gurus in multiple editorials.

While push polling is a frequent tactic in corporate PR and political-campaign smear attempts, we should not see the same tactics originating from what’s supposed to be an objective Senate committee, tasked with intelligently navigating tough questions in the field of technology law.

Read The Complete Posting

The National Journal reports on this as well.

Leave a reply

Search Articles



USTV Recommended Read: