Category "Religion and The State"

The Maker of US Policy

October 26th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

The Maker of US Policy
By Mark Lawson
The Guardian UK
October 8th, 2005

What a stroke of luck that God’s advice to George Bush fits so neatly alongside US national interests.

According to Shaath’s recall of Bush’s confession, God, apparently addressing the president each time as “George”, had told him, in three separate briefings: “Go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan … go and end the tyranny in Iraq … go and get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security.”

While it’s clearly not in a columnist’s interest to encourage other pundits, especially omniscient ones, it would also be fascinating to have the deity’s opinion on whether it should be Clarke or Cameron and just how worried to be about Asian bird flu. But, as a commentator on foreign policy, what’s perhaps most striking is the sudden shift from an Old Testament God (smiting terrorists and tyrants) to such a carefully nuanced position on the Middle East, respecting the key demand of each side.

It’s perhaps surprising that divine revelation should so precisely coincide with state department policy during the Bush administration. A fundamentalist believer would explain this overlap by saying that the president is simply being obedient to God, but it seems rather convenient to have a supreme overlord whose politics so closely mirror your own. The really interesting question for Bush would be whether God has ever told him he was wrong about anything, whether the Maker has broken administration policy as well as making it.

We’re unlikely to get clarification on this because the White House spokespeople seem to have decided, echoing Alastair Campbell’s public line on the possibility that Blair looks to a higher power than Jack Straw on foreign affairs, that “we don’t do God”.

Given British embarrassment about religion, Campbell’s judgment was probably correct, but Bush has spoken openly about his personal conversation with God in the past and in this very week could probably benefit from wearing his sacred heart on his sleeve, as his Christian-right supporters are upset by the nomination to the supreme court of White House counsel Harriet Miers, who is not thought by hard line believers to have put in enough knee-time in public.

But the likeliest reason for the White House’s panic is that they can see the trap set by the Shaath anecdote. Bush’s previous religious admissions have suggested that God was a kind of vice-president, whereas it now seems that George is the running mate.

The political risk of this is obvious. If God is directing American foreign policy, He is presumably also advising on domestic issues, such as Supreme Court nominations. If so, Bush would face the fascinating task of explaining to the Christian right why God advised against a Supreme Court justice who was too associated with Christian fundamentalists.

And, even before the Palestinian insight into his beliefs, we can guess that the president’s theology was in a mess. Throughout his five years in office, Bush has sustained a simple old Sunday-school world view in which external evil threatens American interests and is then met by force which believes it has God on its side. The fact that the perceived aggressors (Bin Laden, Saddam) also feel divinely justified is no more of an obstacle to this belief system than it has been for the religious throughout history.

Hurricane Katrina, though, severely challenges this exegesis. What can a president of such simple religious faith have made of the devastation of America by what insurance policies call an act of God? Whereas even an event as terrible as 9/11 could be sustaining and confirmational for someone of Bush’s apparent Manichean convictions, a sudden drowning of the chosen invites only agonized study of the Book of Job. This affront to Bush’s relationship with God may explain his public bewilderment during the weather crisis.

What we would give to know what Bush’s secretary of higher state said to him after those events. But the president is likely to be less confessional to foreign politicians about these matters from now on.

There’s nothing inherently dangerous about a leader having religious beliefs - politicians can be just as lethal if they believe too devoutly in themselves - but Bush’s alleged conversation with Shaath suggests that the president has kicked all decision-making upstairs. And, even though American politics is theistically inclined, this is understood as too steep a genuflection.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

Strategizing a Christian Coup d’Etat

August 29th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

Strategizing a Christian Coup d’Etat
By Jenny Jarvie
The Los Angeles Times

August 28th, 2005

A group of believers wants to establish Scriptures-based government one city and county at a time.

Greenville, SC - It began, as many road trips do, with a stop at Wal-Mart to buy a portable DVD player.

But Mario DiMartino was planning more than a weekend getaway. He, his wife and three children were embarking on a pilgrimage to South Carolina.
“I want to migrate and claim the gold of the Lord,” said the 38-year-old oil company executive from Pennsylvania. “I want to replicate the statutes and the mores and the scriptures that the God of the Old Testament espoused to the world.”

DiMartino, who drove here recently to look for a new home, is a member of Christian Exodus, a movement of politically active believers who hope to establish a government based upon Christian principles.

At a time when evangelicals are exerting influence on the national political stage - having helped secure President Bush’s reelection - Christian Exodus believes that people of faith have failed to assert their moral agenda: Abortion is legal. School prayer is banned. There are limits on public displays of the Ten Commandments. Gays and lesbians can marry in Massachusetts.

Christian Exodus activists plan to take control of sheriff’s offices, city councils and school boards. Eventually, they say, they will control South Carolina. They will pass godly legislation, defying Supreme Court rulings on the separation of church and state.

“We’re going to force a constitutional crisis,” said Cory Burnell, 29, an investment advisor who founded the group in November 2003.

“If necessary,” he said, “we will secede from the union.”

Burnell has not moved to South Carolina himself - he promised his wife that they would stay in Valley Springs, Calif., until the end of next year - but believes that his 950 supporters will rally to the cause. Five families have moved so far.

Burnell said his inspiration came from the Free State Project, which in October 2003 appealed to libertarians to move to New Hampshire for limited government intervention, lower taxes and greater individual rights. By 2006, organizers had hoped to have 20,000 people committed to relocating to New Hampshire; so far, 6,600 have said they intended to make the move, and only 100 have done so.

Christian Exodus, Burnell predicted, will be more successful.

“There are more Christians than libertarians,” he said.

After scrutinizing electoral records, demographic trends and property prices, Christian Exodus members identified two upstate South Carolina counties - they will not officially say which ones - as prime for a conservative takeover. By September 2006, Burnell hopes to have 2,000 activists in one county and 500 in the other.

Frank and Tammy Janoski have settled into a five-bedroom house with white vinyl siding in a new subdivision in rural Spartanburg County.

“This is where God wants us to be,” he said.

Janoski, 38, a self-employed computer engineer, had been contemplating moving from his deadline-oriented lifestyle in Bethlehem, Pa., to a more conservative region with cheaper housing and lower taxes when a church friend handed him a Christian Exodus flier.

“What attracted me to the movement was the idea of calling back the country to a righteous standard,” he said.

His first six months in South Carolina have been idyllic, Janoski said. Not only do his neighbors wave as they pass by, but they also share most of his conservative Christian beliefs.

“If you’re going to secede, this is the place to do it,” he said. “A lot of the locals have that spirit.”

Although Christian Exodus members are confident that they can capitalize on evangelical disillusionment with the Republican Party, local observers are skeptical.

James Guth, a professor at Furman University in Greenville who studies the influence of religion on politics, does not think that Christian Exodus will be successful beyond a county level.

“South Carolina is a state that is dominated by Republicans,” he said. “Although there are people on the far right edge of the Republican Party … in general, the population is a big fan of Bush.”

Nestled in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains, upstate South Carolina is the most conservative region of a conservative state: Bush won 58% of the South Carolina vote in 2004, and Greenville is home to Bob Jones University, a fundamentalist Christian college that until recently had banned interracial dating.

Cleatus Blackmon, treasurer and director of missions at the Greer Baptist Assn., which oversees 39 Baptist churches in Janoski’s town, doubts that Christian Exodus’ focus on taking over government bodies will appeal to the majority of the region’s Christians.

“You don’t find the word ‘control’ in the scriptures,” he said. “The basic mission of the church is to proclaim God’s redeeming love through the example of Jesus Christ.”

But Christian Exodus activists insist that they will forge ahead, even if they end up polarizing the Christian community.

“We want to separate the wheat from the chaff,” DiMartino said. “There’s a lot of deception in the church. If the Republican Party says something, a lot of churches say it’s gospel.”

Despite its cynicism about the Republican Party, Christian Exodus plans to use the party’s popularity to its advantage. Rather than running for office themselves, Christian Exodus activists hope to influence which Republican candidates win local primaries.

“All we have to do is put our guy on the ballot with an ‘R’ sign,” Burnell said. “It could be a corpse and they’ll vote for him.”

Local Republicans, however, point out that they would never sit idly by while Christian Exodus took over.

“He talks about 2,000 activists, but I can easily get 4,000 activists,” said Bob Taylor, a Republican Greenville County councilman and a dean at Bob Jones University. “There’s incredible dedication to the [Republican] cause.”

While many South Carolinians may oppose abortion and gay marriage, Taylor said, few would support secession.

But DiMartino is not worried about the naysayers.

When he explained Christian Exodus to the man who sold him his home in Pickens County, he said, the salesman gave him a high-five. DiMartino looks forward to living alongside Christians who want to put local government back in the hands of what, he believes, America was really founded for.

“Whether it flies or not,” he said, “is really in the Lord’s hands.”

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

Faith Lost In W’s Designs On Science

August 28th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

Faith Lost In W’s Designs On Science
New York Daily News
August 25th, 2005

The newest controversy surrounding George W. Bush brings into plain sight the issue of the relationship of religion to our educational system. President Bush has said that he believes that the newest term for a universe created by a supreme being, “intelligent design,” should, right next to evolutionary theories, be given equal time in public schools. Perhaps he has forgotten about the separation of church and state. We do not have any obligations to religion other than to allow those who believe to state their beliefs freely unless those beliefs embrace terrorist acts or the murder of abortion doctors (which are largely the same thing).

At the same time it seems to me that those who want to rant and rave about the stupidity of those who believe in God seem to miss another very important point about the species: People love to know things, and they also find great comfort in thinking they know things.

Those in religion and those in science will become huffy and condescending if asked for a bit of detail about how they concluded how it all began. That is because our insecurity demands that we have some sense of where it all came from and, as some in the sciences now claim, when our world came into existence.

But what those in the sciences do not seem to understand is that there are people in their own world who have no difficulty accepting “intelligent design” even if they have risen to the top of their fields.

Read the full article here…
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/340273p-290546c.html

The Parable of Jesus and the Rubber Chicken

August 28th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

The Parable of Jesus and the Rubber Chicken
What if Christ spoke at a Republican Party fund-raiser?
By Tom Peyer
Slate.com

Aug. 25th, 2005

TRANSCRIPT OF JESUS CHRIST’S REMARKS AT A REPUBLICAN PARTY FUND-RAISER, CRAWFORD, TEXAS, AUGUST 2005

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’m going to have a hard time living up to an introduction like that. (LAUGHTER)

First, let Me express My gratitude for your support over the last few years. It’s nice to be thought of as a winner for a change. If I had known we’d get the House, the Senate, and two consecutive terms in the White House (APPLAUSE)-if I’d known all that, I would have had an easier time that Friday on the Cross, let me tell you. (LAUGHTER, APPLAUSE)
But seriously, folks (LAUGHTER)-no, seriously, that day did pass, and then two more. Then I rose from the dead. (CHEERS, APPLAUSE) Thank you. I rose from the dead and I flew up to Heaven. But first, you’ll remember, I made a little side trip to Hell (SCATTERED BOOS) just to get a look at how they do things. And I’m here to tell you, Hell is just like Heaven (AUDIBLE GASPS)-but with taxes. (LAUGHTER, CHEERS, APPLAUSE)

I’d especially like to thank President Bush, who gave me a free Pioneer membership. (AUDIBLE GASPS, MUTTERING) Was I not supposed to say that? Sorry. My point is, the president’s a good man. The only real difference between Me and him is his daddy found a way to forgive Bill Clinton. (WILD APPLAUSE)

This president married well, too. He married a woman. (CHEERS, APPLAUSE) That’s the right way. That’s the way my Dad intended. Respect the sanctity of marriage. Now a few loud people keep saying the government should forget about sanctity, forget about religion. They want separation of church and state. See these hands? See the holes in them? That’s separation of church and state. (APPLAUSE) I know George W. Bush, and I know he won’t ever let that happen to me again. (CHEERS, APPLAUSE)

Ken Mehlman asked me to come down here today to meet with you good people and clear up a few things you’ve been wondering about. I told him I’d be glad to eat a little crow for a good cause. You’ll forgive me if I read a brief prepared statement, but Ken and my Dad want me to get this just right. (LAUGHTER) Here goes.

“In My youth, I made certain ill-advised statements that I now regret. If I offended anyone, I apologize. I want to clarify that it is easy for a rich man to enter the kingdom of Heaven. (CHEERS, WILD APPLAUSE)

“I’d like to apologize specifically to the money-changers. It is My sincere hope that you will come back into the Temple free of charge as My guests.” (WILD APPLAUSE, CHANT OF “U.S.A! U.S.A!”)

Finally-and this is Me speaking for Myself now-I want to say to the meek: Once we finally get rid of the death tax, you’re not inheriting anything. Not while you’re meek, so buck up. (CHEERS) And that goes double for you peacemakers. (LAUGHTER) Good night and Dad bless America. (CHEERS, WILD APPLAUSE)

Tom Peyer is a co-editor of O Holy Cow: The Selected Verses of Phil Rizzuto. Still from The Gospel of John on the Slate home page by Toronto Film Studios/Zuma Press.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

Patriot Pastors

August 9th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

Patriot Pastors
Marilyn H. Karfeld
Cleveland Jewish News

Evangelical clergy seek to save America through the ballot box

America is a Christian nation, at least if you’re counting noses. An overwhelming majority of Americans - 77% or 159 million people - identify themselves as Christians, a recent study shows. Jews, who only comprise 1.3% of the population, rely on the First Amendment’s ban on the state’s endorsing any religion to protect their minority status.

Thus, the Ohio Restoration Project (ORP) has stunned many Jews with its plan to identify and train 2,000 so-called “Patriot Pastors” to get out the evangelical vote for the Ohio primary in May 2006.

The Rev. Russell Johnson, ORP head and senior pastor of Fairfield Christian Church, an evangelical congregation in suburban Columbus, casts the 2006 election as an apocalyptic clash between a virtuous Christianity and the evildoers who oppose Christianity’s values.

“This is a battle between the forces of righteousness and the hordes of hell,” says Johnson on his church’s website. He exhorts evangelical clergy to get off the sidelines and lead America away from secularism and godlessness through the ballot box.

Before the 2004 presidential election, Johnson denounced tax-supported schools that have banned the teaching of creationism, Bible reading and prayer. He blasted the “pagan left” for its warfare against the very definition of marriage. He decried “homosexual rights” that will come with “a flood of demonic oppression.”

Most important, he envisions a Christian America. “Reclaiming the teaching of our Christian heritage among America’s youth is paramount to a sense of national destiny that God has invested into this nation,” he writes on his church website.

In the 2004 presidential election, conservative evangelical Christian voters found a national candidate who shared their values. Thus, they turned out in record numbers to vote for President George Bush.

Wielding Christian power at the polls

ORP hopes to capitalize on that newfound evangelical political fervor. There will be Patriot Pastor policy briefings in eight targeted cities, including Cleveland and Canton/Akron. The pastors are expected to host voter-registration drives in their churches. They will distribute voter guides provided by the Christian Coalition and the Center for Moral Clarity, to “clarify the positions of various candidates, who at times, would like to remain vague and noncommittal,” the ORP website states.

Their goal is to register 500,000 new conservative voters, spreading the church’s view from the pulpit on “values” issues. Ohio for Jesus advertising in 30-second radio spots would feature Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, Republican candidate for governor.

White House adviser Karl Rove has acknowledged that one of his main strategies for the 2004 election was to turn out the white, evangelical Protestant vote. On Election Day 2004, four million more evangelicals voted than in 2000, when Bush lost the popular vote to Democrat Al Gore. (Bush won that race in the Electoral College.)

Ballot issues banning gay marriage, including one in Ohio that amended the state constitution to limit marriage to a union between one man and one woman, drew large numbers of rural and suburban conservatives to the polls.

Buoyed by such success, ORP has new plans to wield conservative Christian influence at the polls.

The Patriot Pastors would help build a database of 300,000 postal addresses and 100,000 e-mail addresses to recruit a network of like-minded Christian voters to be 21st-century Minutemen. These volunteers would help transport the elderly to the polls, provide childcare so parents can vote, and assist with voter registration drives and rallies.

As a nonprofit organization, ORP hopes to raise $1 million for a campaign war chest. The immediate goal is to elect conservative Blackwell as Ohio’s next governor in 2006. A charismatic speaker, Blackwell will be invited to address a statewide Ohio for Jesus rally in late February to mid-March 2006.

Also invited to address the rally are conservative Christians such as the Rev. Franklin Graham, Dr. James Dobson and the Rev. Rod Parsley. Republican politicians expected to attend include former U.S. Rep. Bob McEwen of Hillsboro, Ohio, and former Amb. Alan Keyes. Former Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia, keynote speaker at the 2004 Republican National Convention, is also on the schedule.

Rallies like the above notwithstanding, ORP insists it is nonpartisan and complies with IRS rules that bar nonprofits from endorsing political candidates.

Read the full article here…
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/articles/2005/08/01/news/loca l/acover0729.txt

Ohio Televangelist Has Plenty of Influence

July 16th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

Ohio Televangelist Has Plenty of Influence, But He Wants More
By Ted Wendling
Chicago Tribune

July 1, 2005

COLUMBUS, Ohio — It’s 10:30 a.m. on a Sunday, and the 5,200-seat sanctuary at the World Harvest Church is pulsating with Christian energy.

Worshipers are jumping for Jesus like teenagers at a rock concert as Pastor Rod Parsley, central Ohio’s raging prophet of prosperity, appears in an explosion of sound and light
Buoyed by the emergence of values voters in the 2004 election and fueled by righteous fury at the nation’s courts over the issues of abortion and gay marriage, Parsley, 48, has been whipping America’s evangelical churches into a froth.

For almost a year now, he has crisscrossed the country on a “Silent No More” tour, granting interviews to national news publications and giving notice that he intends to be a major player in state and national politics in the coming years.

Political organization

Parsley’s political platform is the Center for Moral Clarity, a nonprofit formed last summer.

The center is closely aligned with the Ohio Restoration Project, an effort that seeks to organize 1,000 Ohio “Patriot Pastors” who will recruit a network of values voters to become today’s “Minute Men.”

Project activities are scheduled up to the 2006 election, including statewide pastor policy briefings, “Ohio for Jesus” radio spots featuring Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, voter-registration drives and an “Ohio for Jesus” rally in 2006.

If Parsley’s declaration that he will be silent no more sounds incongruous coming from a man who already heads a $40 million-a-year ministry accessible worldwide via 1,400 TV stations and cable affiliates, Parsley has a ready answer.

For too long, he says, the secular left has intimidated Christians. Ministers also have surrendered their First Amendment right to engage in partisan politics, he says, relegating their churches to the status of “social clubs.”

Parsley’s call to action bristles with the metaphors of war. In his writings, he casts himself as a gladiator for God, advancing on “the very hordes of hell in our society.”

Parsley’s critics contend that his political assault comes perilously close to jeopardizing his church’s tax-exempt status because he has done everything but use his pulpit to endorse Blackwell for governor in 2006.

Blackwell wrote one of the four blurbs for Parsley’s new best-selling book, “Silent No More.” In January, Parsley and his mother, Ellen, donated the maximum $2,500 each to Blackwell’s campaign. The pastor also has taken Blackwell around the state on his Silent No More tour, introducing him as Ohio’s “6-foot, 4-inch man of steel.”

Blackwell says Parsley is just one of many Ohio ministers who support him. “Rod Parsley and I are friends,” he said. “We have found common ground on a host of social and cultural issues from the protection of innocent life to the defense of traditional marriage.”

Back at his church, Parsley, drenched in perspiration and wiping his face with a black handkerchief, tells the cheering throng on this Sunday that God has chosen him to be a “catalyst for confrontation.”

“Our times demand it, our history compels it, our future requires it and God is watching,” he says, repeating his book’s final words.

Dismissed by many as Elmer Gantry with a credit-card reader, Parsley is equally revered by others as a stentorian voice of morality in a debauched society.

“Rod Parsley is a man of integrity, a man of character, a man of great moral fiber,” said Darrell Scott, pastor of New Spirit Revival Center, a Pentecostal church in Cleveland Heights. “I really believe the moral fiber of America has continued to erode, and I believe that the failure of great societies like America didn’t necessarily come from outside attacks, but from moral failure.

“Rod Parsley preaches a message of holiness, and because I agree with the message and I know the messenger, I endorse what he’s speaking of.”

Study in contrasts

Interviews and public records show that Parsley is a study in contrasts. He opposes abortion but supports the death penalty.

He decries the nation’s incivility and obsession with sex, but defended the conduct of his father when the senior Parsley was accused of sexually harassing his sister-in-law and punching out a house painter in a bill dispute. He claims he has cured cancer with prayer, but he has been unable to cure his son of a form of autism known as Asperger syndrome.

Parsley, who dropped out of Circleville Bible College during his second year, also urges members of his church and the millions who have watched his Breakthrough ministry on TV to tithe at least 10 percent–regardless of their financial status–telling them that God will return the money.

He has preached this prosperity gospel while accumulating vast personal wealth, including a $1 million, five-bedroom, 5 1/2-bath house with a swimming pool; a $63,000 Cadillac and a $68,000 Lexus LX470 for himself and his wife, Joni; and a $5,000 Polaris all-terrain vehicle.

Parsley shares a gated 21-acre compound with his mom and dad–church officials Ellen and James Parsley–who live in a $940,000 home.

Parsley’s undisclosed salary and royalties from books, CDs and collectibles such as $15 “Born 2 Raze Hell” T-shirts allow him to pursue recreational passions, such as hunting.

Parsley also has a permit to carry a concealed weapon–obtained, he said, because he received death threats.

Asked about his lavish lifestyle, Parsley says he wants “to create a culture where people enjoy the prosperity that God’s given us.”

He addressed the question more directly in his book “God’s Answer to Insufficient Funds.”

“Everybody believed in prosperity until the secular press got upset about it,” he wrote.”… Don’t ever be ashamed of the blessing of God on you. Just throw your head back and say: `Bless me, God. Bless me until I can’t stand it.’”

Copyright © 2005, _Chicago Tribune_ http://www.chicagotribune.com/

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

The Ayatollah of Holy Rollers

June 26th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

“The Ayatollah of Holy Rollers”
America’s Religious Right - Saints or Subversives?
By Steve Weissman
t r u t h o u t | Investigation

May 31st, 2005

Death by stoning for atheists, adulterers, and practicing male homosexuals.

Stoning - or possibly burning at the stake - for atheists, heretics, religious apostates, followers of other religions who proselytize, unmarried females who are unchaste, incorrigible juvenile delinquents, and children who curse or strike their parents.
And, oh yes, death to witches, Satanists, and those who commit blasphemy.

Does this sound like a radical Islamist nightmare, a replay of Afghanistan under the Taliban?

Welcome to the United States of America as Christian Reconstructionists hope to run it. Not as a democracy, which they see as secular heresy. But as a reconstructed Christian nation, complete with biblically sanctioned flogging and slavery.

The Bible rules, OK? And, in its name, a small elect of true believers are now seeking capital-D Dominion over every aspects of our government, laws, education, and personal lives.

An Unlikely Prophet

Reconstructionists have become the extremists to watch, and the key to understanding the current political zing of everyone on the religious right from Sunday-go-to-church Southern Baptists to neo-Nazis in Christian identity militias.

The movement and its “Dominion Theology” are relatively new, dating from the publication in 1973 of The Institutes of Biblical Law by the late Rousas John Rushdoony. A man of widely acclaimed brilliance and near-encyclopedic knowledge, Rushdoony claimed to descend from a long line of aristocratic Armenian clerics reaching back to the year 315. He himself was an ordained minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, not be confused with the generally liberal Presbyterian Church (USA).

Rev. Rushdoony was no liberal. Though gentle in his personal demeanor, he and his Chalcedon Foundation preached nothing less than a holy war “to demolish every kind of theory, humanistic, evolutionary, idolatrous, or otherwise, and every kind of rampart or opposition to the dominion of God in Christ.”

As early as 1963, Rushdoony wrote a “Christian revisionist” historical account called The Nature of the American System, in which he rejected the separation of church and state. The authors of the Constitution, he wrote, intended “to perpetuate a Christian order.”

He similarly opposed the secular bent of American public schools, becoming an early proponent of Christian home-schooling, which he defended as a First Amendment right of their parents.

“We must use the doctrine of religious liberty … until we train up a generation of people who know that there is no religious neutrality, no neutral law, no neutral education, and no neutral civil government,” explained his son-in-law Gary North. “Then they will get busy constructing a Bible-based social, political and religious order which finally denies the religious liberty of the enemies of God.”

Rushdoony opposed labor unions, women’s equality, and civil rights laws. He favored racial segregation and slavery, which he felt had benefited black people because it introduced them to Christianity. He largely denied the Holocaust. And he made it kosher for Christian leaders like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell openly to despise democracy.

“Supernatural Christianity and democracy are inevitably enemies,” wrote Rushdoony, “Democracy is the great love of the failures and cowards of life.”

In the highly divided world of Christian denominations, Rushdoony was - in journalist Marghe Covino’s exquisite phrase - the most unlikely “Ayatollah of Holy Rollers.” Few members of the Assembly of God or other evangelical, Pentecostal, or charismatic churches even know his name, and they are only now becoming comfortable with some of his ideas.

Evangelicals, who provide most of the foot soldiers for the religious right, have long stressed a personal relationship with God and the importance of having a born-again religious experience. Rushdoony, as an Orthodox Presbyterian, focused less on how they felt their inner faith than on how they lived their lives and obeyed “God’s law.”

Evangelicals immerse themselves in the New Testament and some of their mega-churches at times seem almost New Age. Rushdoony was an Old Testament patriarch, following in the more austere tradition of Puritan rule in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Calvin’s theocratic governance of early 16th Century Geneva, and the Mosaic law of the ancient Israelites.

Evangelicals - or at least most of them at present - believe that Christ will return to establish a Millennium of biblical rule, and many take as gospel the End Time stories of the Rapture that the Rev. Tim LaHaye has popularized in his “Left Behind” novels. Rushdoony saw LaHaye’s dispensational prophecies as “cheap grace” and “escapist theology,” preaching instead that Christ would return only after virtuous Christians created “a world order under God’s law.”

Nor are Evangelical leaders rushing to proclaim their adherence to the terrifying Christian theocracy that Rushdoony’s Reconstructionists now seek. Few Americans want to live like Puritans or die at the stake for committing a sin. “Dominion Theology” is not an easy revolution to sell, at least not yet.

In the November 1998 issue of Reason, Walter Olson told of two of televangelist Jerry Falwell’s associates who wrote an article in which they criticized the Reconstructionists for advocating ideas that even they, as biblical fundamentalists, found “scary.” As an example, the authors mentioned “mandating the death penalty for homosexuals and drunkards.”

Rushdoony dashed off a letter to the editor complaining. Reconstructionists, he wrote, had no intention of putting drunkards to death.

With denials like this, the Reconstuctions “allow everyone else to feel moderate,” Olson concluded. “Almost any anti-abortion stance seems nuanced when compared with Gary North’s advocacy of public execution not just for women who undergo abortions but for those who advised them to do so. And with the Rushdoony faction proposing the actual judicial murder of gays, fewer blink at the position of a Gary Bauer or a Janet Folger, who support laws exposing them to mere imprisonment.”

But the gap between the Biblical “moderates” and Reconstructions is getting shorter every day. As an Evangelical Southern Baptist, Falwell still distances himself from Rushdoony over questions of theology. But, he increasingly talks of Christians exercising dominion over America’s secular institutions.

So does the charismatic Pat Robertson. “”There is no way that government can operate successfully unless led by godly men and women operating under the laws of the God of Jacob,” he wrote in The New World Order.

So do evangelical preachers like James Dobson, Don Wildmon, D. James Kennedy, and Tim LaHaye. Whatever they might believe about the End Times, and no matter how often they deny that they’ve become Reconstructionists, today’s evangelical leaders no longer leave the future to the power of prayer while waiting passively for Christ to return.

“Christian Reconstructionism is a stealth theology, spreading its influence throughout the Religious Right,” explains journalist Frederick Clarkson, who closely follows the field. As he sees it, the Reconstructionists gave evangelicals a new set of ideological tools. These included Rushdoony’s apocalyptic vision of rule by biblical law, his analysis of America as a Christian nation, the prospect of complete control, intellectual self-confidence, and a positive program for political involvement.

All of these the evangelicals had historically lacked, while the Reconstructionists wanted the one thing the evangelicals had - a huge army of followers they could mobilize with their churches, Bible colleges, publishing houses, and broadcasting stations.

“As recently as the early 1990s, most evangelicals viewed Reconstructionists as a band of theological misfits without a following,” says Clarkson. “All that has changed, along with the numbers and character of the Christian Right. The world of evangelicalism and, arguably, American politics generally will not be the same.”

If Clarkson is right, and the evidence suggests that he is, Rushdoony has inspired a major revolution in American religious thought, one that now threatens to provoke a political revolution as well. But before taking to the barricades with Bible in hand, his troops would do well to realize that Rushdoony has smuggled into their kit some very un-Christlike politics.

Witch Hunting

No surprise to those who track the religious right, Rushdoony enjoyed a long friendship with Robert Welch, the founder of the John Birch Society and the man who accused President Dwight Eisenhower of being a knowing Communist agent. Rushdoony took great interest in how the Birchers worked and even mentioned them admiringly in his epic Institutes of Biblical Law. “The key to the John Birch Society’s effectiveness has been a plan of operation which has a strong resemblance to the early church,” he wrote. Rushdoony denied ever becoming a Bircher himself, but not because of any political disagreement. As he told Marghe Covino of the Sacramento News & Review, “Welch always saw things in terms of conspiracy and I always see things in terms of sin.” A witty bon mot, Rushdoony’s response overstated the divergence. He, too, found conspiracies everywhere. But where his friend Welch saw Reds, Rushdoony saw Satan and his modern-day hellhounds, the followers not only of Karl Marx, but also of Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud, John Dewey, and - of course - the Unitarians.

“All sides of the humanistic spectrum are now, in principle, demonic; communists and conservatives, anarchists and socialists, fascists and republicans,” he explained.

Pushing his rightwing politics, Rushdoony was one of the first members of the secretive Council for National Policy, which the Rev. Tim LaHaye and others started to bring right-wing Christians, other conservative activists, and John Birchers together with wealthy patrons willing to fund them. He also served on the board of Dr. Jay Grimstead’s Coalition on Revival (COR), an umbrella group that attempted to bridge the theological differences of competing sects within an increasing emphasis on dominating secular institutions.

Characteristically, Rushdoony soon found fault with both the Council and Coalition, as he did with most religious and political organizations. But both succeeded in selling his far right politics and theocratic religious ideas to millions of unsuspecting evangelicals, who had once led America’s fight to keep church and state forever separate.

They should have known better, and so should we all. “The purpose of regeneration is that man reconstruct all things in conformity to God’s order, not in terms of man’s desire for peace,” Rushdoony warned in his Institutes of Biblical Law. “This purpose and mission involves law and coercion.”

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

The Lure of Christian Nationalism

June 12th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

The Lure of Christian Nationalism
America’s Religious Right - Saints or Subversives?
By Steve Weissman
t r u t h o u t | Investigation

April 6th, 2005

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…
— First Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense founded on the Christian religion.
— Treaty of Tripoli, signed on June 10, 1797, by President John Adams.

When Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin boasted that his God was bigger than Islam’s, many people demanded his scalp. But, as angry as his critics were, they dismissed what he said as little more than military machismo, political insensitivity, and bone-headed public relations. How could we possibly win Muslim hearts and minds when this highly decorated Crusader so callously belittled Allah?
Few critics asked the tougher question: What did Gen. Boykin’s remarks mean for the U.S. Constitution, which he had sworn to support and defend, and which - in the very first words of the First Amendment - forbids any “establishment of religion?”

Dressed in full military uniform with his spit-polished paratroop boots, Boykin spoke to at least 23 evangelical groups around the country, proclaiming that America was “a Christian nation.”

“We in the army of God, in the house of God, kingdom of God have been raised for such a time as this,” he declared. “[Our] spiritual enemy will only be defeated if we come against them in the name of Jesus.”

Defending Boykin, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld carefully cast the issue as one of free speech and religious freedom, both of which the First Amendment guarantees.

“There are a lot of things that are said by people that are their views,” said Rumsfeld, “and that’s the way we live. We are free people and that’s the wonderful thing about our country, and I think for anyone to run around and think that can be managed or controlled is probably wrong.”

But, in expressing his beliefs, Gen. Boykin spoke as a high-ranking official. A former commander and 13-year veteran of the top-secret Delta Force, he had recently become deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, the Pentagon’s top uniformed spook. In that post, he helped expand American torture at Abu Ghraib and currently oversees the Pentagon’s worldwide covert operations, including the widely reported “death squads.”

Nor was Gen. Boykin simply passing comment on the religious and cultural heritage of his fellows Americans. Instead, the evangelical general directly challenged the plain language of the Constitution and over 200 years of Supreme Court decisions maintaining what Thomas Jefferson called “the separation of church and state.”

A Christian Nation

With all their many sects and denominations, American evangelicals differ on all sorts of questions, from when Jesus Christ will return to the proper way to run a church. But most Southern Baptists and Pentecostals share the belief, more political than religious, that America once was and should again become a Christian nation.

This is Christian nationalism, and no one has done more to popularize it than an energetic young man named David Barton. A self-taught historian, he has dredged up hundreds of fascinating historical quotes and anecdotes in an effort to prove that the founding fathers were primarily “orthodox, evangelical Christians” who intended to create a God-fearing Christian government.

Barton’s books, videos, and Wallbuilders website are wildly popular on the religious right, and his views have become gospel for Pat Robertson’s Christian Coalition, James Dobson’s Focus on the Family, Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University, D. James Kennedy’s Coral Ridge Ministries, Phyllis Schafly’s Eagle Forum, and hundreds of Christian radio and TV stations.

In 2002, Barton appeared on Pat Robertson’s 700 Club armed with a stack of books and historical artifacts.

“This is the book that the founders said they used in writing the Declaration … John Locke’s Two Treatises of Civil Government, from 1765,” he showed Robertson. “This quotes the Bible 1,700 times to show the proper operation of civil government. No wonder we have had a successful government - 226 years we celebrate this year. There are 1700 Bible verses at the base of what they did in writing the Declaration.”

“So,” said Barton, “this nonsense that these guys wanted a secular nation, that they didn’t want any God in government, it doesn’t hold up.”

Robertson asked about a Revolutionary War motto.

“The motto … was ‘No king but King Jesus,’” said Barton. “It was built actually on what Jefferson and Franklin had proposed as the national motto, which is, ‘Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.’”

To his credit, Barton highlights the religious side of the American Revolution that conventional historians often overlook. But to his critics, Barton’s hyperactive enthusiasm quickly outruns any historical expertise he might have. He ignores mountains of evidence that contradict what he wants to believe. He relies on second- and third-hand sources, often with a religious agenda of their own. He fails to put much of anything in context. He misquotes and distorts Supreme Court decisions. And, he confuses his present-day evangelical faith with the very different religious sentiments of earlier times.

Even more galling to his critics, Barton systematically fails to see that many, if not most, of the founders were men of the 17th and 18th Century Enlightenment, who consciously rejected any literal interpretation of the Bible. To the degree they had religious faith, and many did, they believed in a God who - like a cosmic watchmaker - created the world and its natural laws, and then played no further part.

Deism, as they called their belief, runs unmistakably through the Declaration of Independence, in which Thomas Jefferson wrote of the “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” rather than of the personal, miracle-working God of David Barton’s Christianity.

To cite only one example:

I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition [Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies. (Letter to Dr. Woods)

Barton short-changes this Enlightenment philosophy. At one point, he even claimed that Jefferson wanted his wall of separation to work in only one direction. “Government will not run the church,” Barton paraphrased him, “but we will still use Christian principles with government.” Jefferson never said anything of the kind, as Barton was later forced to admit.

Similarly, he quoted “the father of the Constitution,” James Madison:

We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.

No one could find where Madison ever said anything close. In fact, in the debate over religious freedom in Virginia, he said the opposite, advocating “total separation of the church from the state.” Again, Barton had to back down.

Rob Boston, of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, is perhaps Barton’s most persistent critic, and accuses him of “factual errors, half truths and distortions.” Boston has published a list of 12 bogus quotations that Barton has admitted getting wrong.

But Barton suffers a bigger glitch. His “history” undermines his conclusion. The more he can show the founders as Christian in their personal convictions, the less he can answer the obvious: Why, then, did they leave out of the Constitution any mention of God, Jesus Christ, or Christianity? And why did they explicitly reject any religious test for public office, which many of the colonies had enforced?

The explanation is simple. Whatever their religious beliefs, their political philosophy led the founders to move in a different, revolutionary direction. Because they had seen religious conflict and repression first hand, and knew of the bloody religious wars in Europe, the authors of the Constitution set out purposely NOT to create a Christian nation. And they did it by prohibiting both the establishment of a national church and the mixing of God and government.

Succeeding generations have maintained the wall only imperfectly, as when Congress put the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance during the Cold War hysteria of the 1950s. But, until recently, the vast majority of Americans paid at least lip service to the separation of church and state, and no one more fervently than Southern Baptists and Pentecostals, who feared that Episcopalians, Congregationalists, Catholics, and others might use the power of the state against them.

Now growing rapidly while the more established denominations decline, the evangelicals suddenly see a chance to bend government to their will. This likely explains why they have reversed their belief in separation and adopted a radically new understanding of American history.

As for David Barton, he became vice-chairman of the Texas Republican Party, which has committed itself officially to declare the United States “a Christian nation” and “dispel the myth of separation of church and state.” He also took a job in 2004 with the Bush-Cheney campaign, which hired him to tour the country spreading his Christian nationalism to evangelical groups, the very people who cheered General Jerry Boykin as their “Onward, Christian Soldier.”

© : t r u t h o u t 2005

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

Pie In The Sky

June 6th, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

Pie In The Sky
America’s Religious Right - Saints or Subversives?
By Steve Weissman
t r u t h o u t | Investigation

April 26th, 2005

Long-haired preachers come out every night,
Try to tell you what’s wrong and what’s right;
But when asked how ’bout something to eat
They will answer with voices so sweet:
You will eat, bye and bye,
In that glorious land above the sky;
Work and pray, live on hay,
You’ll get pie in the sky when you die.

-Joe Hill, Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), 1911

Rev. Tim LaHaye thinks deep thoughts. Co-author of the best-selling Left Behind and Babylon Rising novels, the 78-year-old evangelical probes the mind of God as revealed in Holy Scriptures.
Building on a theological twist that dates back to the 1830s, he deftly tells of the End Time, when the Lord raises born-again Christians bodily into the heavens. LaHaye and his fellow believers call this the Rapture, and find their biblical inspiration in Paul’s first letter to the church at Thessalonica.

For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. ( I Thes. 4:16-17).

Thanks largely to LaHaye and a dedicated cadre of like-minded prophecy preachers, the mainstream of America’s 80 million evangelicals now read Paul’s words to mean something radically different from most earlier interpretations. In growing numbers, these born-again Christians fervently expect the Rapture to come within their lifetimes.

For believers, it doesn’t get any better than this. They get their pie in the sky. They need not wait for the sweet bye and bye. And they never, ever have to die.

The belief - premillennial dispensationalism, to use the theological mouthful - has obvious appeal, and has fueled a quintessentially American messianic movement, the latest and possibly most powerful of our country’s recurrent Christian revivals.

But the prophecy has a downside, which its adherents often fail to spell out fully.

As LaHaye reads the Holy Writ, the Rapture leads to the Great Tribulation, with floods and earthquakes, pestilence and epidemics, anarchy in the streets, and demonic battles against the one world government of the anti-Christ, whom he portrays in his novels as the Secretary General of the United Nations, a suave Romanian named Nicholae Carpathia. The forces of good finally defeat this Emperor of Evil in a famous victory at Armageddon, after which Jesus Christ returns to rule the earth.

Oh, and one other small point: According to the prophecy, most of the world’s Jews - or perhaps most of those in Israel - will perish in a second Holocaust. “The Remnant,” as LaHaye calls them, must then accept Jesus Christ as the true Messiah or face eternal damnation.

“And the Jews?” he asks in one of his Left Behind novels. “Well two-thirds of them will be wiped out by now and the survivors will accept Jesus at last.”

Others - notably the Palestinians - have to pay in advance. For the prophecy to be fulfilled, for the Rapture to come, for Christ to return, the Jews must first rule all of Eretz Yisroel, the biblical Land of Israel.

“Ever since Israel was recognized as a nation, we knew that such perilous times would come,” wrote LaHaye. “That event, more than any other, started God’s prophetic time clock of end-time events.”

No wonder zealous Christian Zionists give millions of dollars to help build and defend new Jewish settlements on Palestinian land.

No wonder they oppose any serious effort to make peace in the Holy Land, even to the point of publicly threatening President Bush whenever he dares to sound even-handed.

And no wonder so many American evangelicals support Mr. Bush’s war in Babylon as a prelude to Armageddon.

The Hand of God?

With more than a dozen novels selling over 60 million copies at last count, plus twice as many non-fiction books, LaHaye has become the most successful Christian writer since the Bible. And, with no sense of irony, he has now helped turn the Bible’s authorship from a question of religious belief and historical scholarship into an intense political dispute.

Fundamentalists like LaHaye see the hand of God in both Old and New Testaments, treating the words as Gospel, unfailingly true and authoritative, though open to prophetic interpretation. Many other Christians, believing Muslims and Jews, Hindus and Buddhists, pagans and polytheists all hold their own differing views, while millions who heed the Enlightenment rather than Revelation reject any faith-based approach to old lore as lacking in hard evidence.

As for probing ancient Biblical passages to predict the future, many Christians find that silly beyond belief.

In a free country, such differences only make life more interesting. The same First Amendment that keeps government from meddling with our religious beliefs also permits us to express our opinions freely, no matter how much they may outrage our fellow Americans or even blaspheme their gods. At least, we now have those freedoms. We won’t if LaHaye wins the war he has fought most of his life.

Considered by many of his peers as the most influential evangelical of our time, even more so than Pat Robertson or Billy Graham, LaHaye inspired Jerry Falwell to create the Moral Majority. He also gave millions of dollars to Falwell’s Liberty University to build the Tim & Beverly LaHaye Student Center and the Tim LaHaye School of Biblical Prophecy.

LaHaye raised the money to create The Institute for Creation Research, which leads the fight against Darwin’s theory of evolution.

LaHaye served as the most visible founder and first president of the secretive Council for National Policy, which brings together leading evangelicals and other conservatives with right-wing billionaires willing to pay for a conservative religious revolution.

Active in electoral politics as well, LaHaye used his Californians for Biblical Morality to help make Ronald Reagan governor. He created the American Coalition for Traditional Values to mobilize evangelical voters to put far-right candidates into office nationwide. And he personally joined the small group of religious conservatives who met with George W. Bush in 1999, grilled him on his presidential aspirations, and gave him their Christian seal of approval.

LaHaye’s wife Beverly wields her own influence as founder and chairman of the Washington-based Concerned Women for America, a traditionalist, anti-choice, anti-gay group dedicated “to bring biblical principles into all levels of public policy.” She has also written several highly successful books, hosted a radio talk show, and spoken out regularly in the mass media. Together, she and her husband are, as Time magazine called them, “the Christian Power Couple.”

Yet, for all of Tim LaHaye’s enormous clout as a Christian leader, his political ideas have little in common with the love-thy-neighbor teachings of Jesus Christ, as proclaimed by so many other Christians, including evangelicals like the Rev. Jim Wallis, of Sojourners.

A Christian Nationalist, he would use government coercion to enforce “Biblical morality.” No more separation of church and state. And no free speech to say what God doesn’t want to say. As for which Christians would govern the nation, he has frequently attacked the Catholic Church and accused mainline Protestants of not being Christians at all. He has also blamed Jews for the crucifixion of Christ and regularly lambastes Islam.

Other of his political notions have an even less exalted pedigree, harking back to the far right strongholds of Southern California circa 1960, where the Reagan Revolution first took root. In the ideologically charged hothouse of the time, Dr. Fred Schwarz and his Christian Anti-Communism Crusade regularly convinced apparently sane people that Communist conspirators might soon take over the country.

LaHaye, a young Baptist preacher from Bob Jones University, did his part by lecturing and running training seminars for the similarly-obsessed John Birch Society.

The Birchers set the tone. Founded in 1958 by a leading Massachusetts Republican named Robert Welch, they took their name from Capt. John Morrison Birch, a Baptist missionary who became a behind-the-lines intelligence officer in China during World War II. Birch died in August 1945, executed by Chinese Communist revolutionaries.

Welch portrayed the missionary spy as “the first victim of the Cold War,” and blamed “the loss of China” on a Communist fifth column that included Presidents Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower. Picking up where the discredited Senator Joseph McCarthy left off, Welch publicly and repeatedly called Ike “a conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy.”

Welch also accused the president’s brother Milton Eisenhower of being Ike’s superior in the Communist apparatus and charged David Rockefeller and the Council of Foreign Relations with actively trying to impose a world tyranny.

LaHaye never outgrew this paranoid world of devilish conspiracies. But instead of hysterically bashing Bolsheviks, he has increasingly targeted “secular humanists.” As LaHaye throws the invective about, it embraces everyone from avowed atheists and Darwinians to wobbly Christians who’ve somehow fallen short.

“Most of the evils in the world today,” LaHaye wrote in The Battle for the Mind (1980), “can be traced to humanism, which has taken over our government, the UN, education, TV and most of the other influential things in life.”

“We must remove all humanists from public office and replace them with pro-moral political leaders,” he urged.

Twenty years later, in Mind Siege, LaHaye again rallied his brand of Bible-believers for an all-out crusade against a Satanic conspiracy of secular humanists, liberals (who are really socialists at heart), atheists and evolutionists, moral relativists and abortion providers, homosexuals and one-worlders.

Mind Siege adamantly denies that the First Amendment requires the separation of church and state, and blames the humanist conspiracy for spreading “the big lie” that it does. No surprise, his co-author David Noebel now heads Fred Schwarz’s Christian Anti-Communist Crusade.

Repeal the New Deal

From its beginning, the John Birch Society put forward a comprehensive program that went far beyond the Cold War. The Birchers campaigned vigorously to “Get the US Out of the UN,” which they saw as trying to build a one-world Socialist government. They also worked to impeach Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, stop school busing, end social security, and abolish the progressive income tax.

Many of the leading Birchers were wealthy, and wanted to protect their wealth from reforms that helped the less fortunate members of society.

LaHaye pushes the same approach, using religion to subvert the Constitution, repeal the New Deal, and turn America into a an undemocratic “Christian nation” that favors the rich.

He and his fellow preachers systematically back “Christian” politicians who hurt the poor and middle classes, short-changing many, if not most, evangelical worshippers. But, don’t despair. America’s religious revivals historically wear thin, and should the Rapture fail to come, as it likely will, no one can say how long the believers will continue to buy the Rev. LaHaye’s pie in the sky.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

A Deadly Culture of Life

June 2nd, 2005 by Andy in Religion and The State

A Deadly Culture of Life
America’s Religious Right - Saints or Subversives?
By Steve Weissman
t r u t h o u t | Investigation

April 26th, 2005

“Our goal is a Christian Nation…. We have a Biblical duty, we are called by God to conquer this country. We don’t want equal time. We don’t want Pluralism. We want theocracy. Theocracy means God rules. I’ve got a hot flash. God rules.”
— Randall Terry, Head of Operation Rescue, speaking in Fort Wayne, Indiana, on April 15, 1993, as reported the following day in The News-Sentinel.

Randall Terry claims he has mellowed, as most of us do with age. But, along with many of his fellow evangelicals, he remains aggressively committed to his goal of turning America into “a Christian nation.”
Appearing almost nightly last month on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC as the spokesman for the parents of the brain-damaged Terri Schiavo, the charismatic militant urged Florida’s Governor Jeb Bush to violate a court order and reinsert the feeding tube that had kept the poor woman in what her husband and doctors called “a persistent vegetative state” for nearly 15 years.

“If Gov. Bush wants to be the man that his brother is, he needs to step up to the plate like President Bush did when the United Nations told him not to go into Iraq,” Randall Terry proclaimed. “Be a man. Put politics aside.”

If the Brothers Bush and other Republican politicians did not do as he said, the 46 year-old Terry threatened political retribution:

I promise you, if she dies, there’s going to be hell to pay with pro-life, pro-family, Republican people of various legislative levels, both statewide and federally, who have used pro-life, pro-family, conservative rhetoric to get into power, and then when they have the power, they refuse to use it.

Feeling the heat from his right-wing base, President Bush publicly urged the courts to show “a presumption in favor of life.” Pope John Paul II had proclaimed a “culture of life” years before, and the president took every opportunity to repeat the phrase.

“It should be our goal as a nation,” he declared, “to build a culture of life, where all Americans are valued, welcomed, and protected - and that culture of life must extend to individuals with disabilities.”

Who could disagree? But what strange “culture of life” enables Mr. Bush to preach compassion as he pursues war? What “culture of life” embraces Randall Terry, who calls Mrs. Schiavo’s husband Michael “a monster” and openly preaches hatred, violence, and death?

A used car salesman and failed rock star, Terry created Operation Rescue in 1987, organizing violent blockades at abortion clinics around the country and openly applauding vandalism, arson, and the murder of doctors and clinic workers.

One of Terry’s closest co-workers - James Kopp - shot and killed Dr. Barnett A. Slepian, 52, a Buffalo obstetrician and gynecologist who performed abortions. Another of Terry’s cohorts - Pastor Matt Trewhella, founder of Missionaries to the Preborn - openly called for the formation of armed militias.

Terry himself spent five months in prison for sending one of his people to show a fetus to presidential candidate Bill Clinton in 1992, violating a federal court order. “If a Christian voted for Clinton, he sinned against God,” said Terry. “It’s that simple.”

More mouth than muscle, Terry generally restricted himself to justifying the killing of “abortion doctors” and promising their legal execution.

“When I, or people like me, are running the country, you’d better flee,” he warned, “because we will find you, we will try you, and we will execute you. I mean every word of it. I will make it part of my mission to see to it that they are tried and executed.”

Talking here to an August 1995 banquet of Howard Phillip’s Taxpayers Alliance, Terry announced a new leadership institute that would provide “three days of intense training on vision, courage, biblical ethics, raising up a cadre of people who are militant, who are fierce, who are unmerciful to the deeds of darkness, unmerciful to the ideologies of hell.”

“If we’re going to have true reformation in America,” he declared, “it is because men once again, if I may use a worn out expression, have righteous testosterone flowing through their veins. They are not afraid of contempt for their contemporaries. They are not even here to get along. They are here to take over.”

With Terry’s view in mind, the Tax Payers Alliance has now become the Constitution Party, which promises “to restore our government to its Constitutional limits and our law to its Biblical foundation.” Roy Moore, the “Ten Commandments Judge,” is one of the party favorites, and has spoken at their events.

The party also continues to work closely with “the Patriot Movement” and its right-wing militias, including a number of groups that are virulently anti-Semitic, deny the Holocaust, and speak longingly of Der Fuhrer.

Far more troubling, Randall Terry’s vision seems to have also taken over much of the Republican Party, many of whose leading figures now openly pursue the same Christian Nationalism, deny the separation of church and state, and attack “unelected” federal and state judges.

“Mrs. Schiavo’s death is a moral poverty and a legal tragedy,” proclaimed the GOP’s Tom DeLay, Majority Leader of the US House of Representatives.

“This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today.”

Republican Senator John Cornyn, of Texas, went even further, appearing to justify violent attacks against judges.

“We seem to have run through a spate of courthouse violence recently that’s been on the news,” he said, “and I wonder whether there may be some connection between the perception in some quarters on some occasions where judges are making political decisions yet are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in - engage in violence.”

And now Bill Frist, the Senate Majority Leader and a leading contender for the GOP presidential bid in 2008, has joined with right-wing evangelicals in a TV extravaganza to portray the Democratic defense of traditional Senate filibuster rules as a radical attack on “People of Faith.”

“For years activist courts, aided by liberal interest groups like the ACLU, have been quietly working under the veil of the judiciary, like thieves in the night, to rob us of our Christian heritage and our religious freedoms,” declared Tony Perkins, the chief lobbyist for one of the sponsoring groups, the Family Research Council.

“We must stop this unprecedented filibuster of people of faith.”

When so many Republican leaders and their evangelical allies sound so much like Randall Terry, we can only wonder whether the Grand Old Party will ever again find the voice of reason.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

« Previous ArticleNext Article »

Search Articles



USTV Recommended Read: