This may be one of the more pathetically disturbing aspects of the Bush administration.
Media reform groups are calling for a deeper investigation of Bush administration advertising and propaganda efforts following the release of a report that concludes the White House has spun a web of public relations (PR) contracts larger than previously thought.
At issue are agreements to produce everything from advertisements to video news releases - government-vetted spots designed to air alongside and to be indistinguishable from regular televised news reports.
Critics of the state-sponsored content said it constitutes part of a broader government attack on press freedom and that it amounts to a subversion of democracy.
“When elected public servants use taxpayer dollars to manipulate or deceive the very people whose consent they require for their legitimacy, our public servants then become our masters,” said Sanho Tree, a fellow at the Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Policy Studies.
Here’s a money shot line…
Conservative media watchdog Accuracy in Media faulted the report as based on an incomplete accounting of Clinton PR spending. The GAO would never undertake a more thorough study because the three-year statute of limitations governing such reviews has passed, the group said, adding that the democratic legislators had this fact in mind when they commissioned their study.
AIM, trotting out Clinton again. Never mind the incontrovertible facts about the Bush administration spending billions of tax dollars on funding covert propaganda, both overseas as well as domestically, they are upset cause this study didn’t want to compare the amount of bullshit being spun by the Busheviks with PR pushed by the Clinton administration. One would think that if they were really concerned about ‘accuracy in media’, and dedicated to pursuit of those principles, they would be livid that the Bush administration has spent so much money on poisoning our information system with deceptive and often misleading information in order to generate support for their policies. But once again, its party and ideology over principles.